More Essay Examples on Empiricism Rubric
What we have to understand from this is that, we human beings, utilize what may be roughly characterized as inductive or scientific methods of extending knowledge from the observed to the unobserved, using the limited experience and the result of the direct scientific observation, and, we still believe with a confidence (though the confidence is not ‘Justifiable”), that we know something beyond the criteria of our experience which is the problem of induction, which is also the problem of explicating the very concept of inductive evidence.
Hume argued that conditions are based upon experience and they are always subject to change. And linking the fact to the science behind the secret nature of body which is learned from the past experience, changes subsequently without change in their sensible qualities. Foundations of substance are always established after the subject has been developed, not before the development. For example, science, after carrying out certain number of experiments, comes with a conclusion, which is established as the scientific truth.
The future conditions/occurrences are imagined as well as believed to be based upon the summary of the science, which is basically the acceptance of the empiricism as the subsequent scientific basis to be true. But at the same time, the basic foundation of the science is also based upon logic and faith is required to believe so, which is pretty irrational. Hence, Hume provides us a room to doubt and destabilizes the entire method of our understanding. He clarifies us that at any point of deduction, a leap of faith is necessary at some level.